Atheist Girl

Thanks for posting the article! Evidence for morality without adding a god to the equation is just one more nail in the coffin of religion. Too bad it's a heck of a zombie, and keeps coming back demanding more brains - and a 10% tithe.

 

IT IS JUST A THEORY. LIKE OTHERS.
Vaya con Dios

 

Why do humans commit crimes, though?

We can agree that it is wrong to rape and murder, but can we blame the rapist or the murderer?

So, there is some element of morality intrinsic to human nature. This does not alter the fact that morality and behaviour are ultimately chemical processes over which we have no real power.

We cannot be blamed for our actions.

 

"Vaya con bullshit, more like it Silvestre.."
I didn’t know that this was a racist weblog. OK. It’s good to know it.
ADIOS (for good)

 

Hmmm, somebody's touchy today.

 

If morality comes from religion then why don't we stone children for disrespecting their parents in majority Christian countries? That is what the scripture says to do and before anyone leaps in with "let he who is without sin blah blah blah" just remember that your superman is also quoted in Luke 19:27 saying something rather different.

Morality obviously doesn't come from religion since the only people that actual adhere to the scriptural morality are the bloodthirsty fundamentalists that mainstream religion tries to distance itself from anyway. The rest of us, including the Pope, find the literal scriptural approach to morality rather extremely barbaric and unpleasant. The argument was lost by the theists the second they stopped the inquisition (Muslims excluded from this of course) they just didn't notice they lost yet. Still, that's not the only argument for which that has happened.

Que me cago en dios. :)

 

Good article. The problem with the theist's assertion that we derive our moral nature from God is that they fail to explain where God derives his own moral nature.

Memoirs of an ex-Christian

 

This comment has been removed by the author.

 

What might be called legitimate morality comes from group self-interest. We try to prevent murder, rape, theft, etc. (including punishing those who commit them) for the same reason we try to prevent plagues and floods -- not because an imaginary God forbade them, but because they are dangerous.

Religion's contribution is a fake "morality" condemning things like atheism or unusual sexual behavior among consenting adults, which don't harm other parties and are therefore none of society's business.

Frans de Waal's books are well worth reading for anyone interested in this subject. Apes (not monkeys) are astonishingly similar to humans in behavior, just as they are in anatomy and biochemistry. If the apes are not our close relatives, then that imaginary God was sure trying very hard to make it LOOK like they are.

 

What's interesting about the article is that it makes the presupposition that evolution is the driving force which hard-wired this "moral grammar" into peoples genetic code.

I've not read his book but from the article it would seem his entire premises is based on the infallibility of evolution. It's just as easy for a theist to say that God hard wired this "moral grammar" into our genetic code.

So I suppose it really boils back down to the debate of whether or not a God exists. Interestly enough I'd say that the authors findings (as summarized here) would actually be consistent with Biblical doctrine if we exchange God for evolution as the author of this genetic hardwiring.

A final point - Christian doctrine fully agrees with the concept that we do not have a blank slate from birth but are rather inclined to rebel in sin. So I'm not really sure why the idea that teachers and parents must shape the innate behaviors of children is so counterintuitive to religious (Judeo-Christian) thought.

 

Theism does not explain why God would also hard-wire precursors of human morality into apes -- unless, again, God for some reason designed everything to look as if we evolved from apes.

 

Also,absolutely every piece of evidence ever found fits with the theory of evolution. God and evolution are not interchangable terms.

"A final point - Christian doctrine fully agrees with the concept that we do not have a blank slate from birth but are rather inclined to rebel in sin."

So the reverse of what this study is actually saying then - that we are inclined to cooperative mutually beneficial behaviour.

 

This is a good article. I'm so sick of theist claiming that their sense of morality is derived from their scripture and that atheist are inherently eveil. When they say that, I'm sure they haven't read it. It shocks the conscience to think about some of the atrocities laid out in some of the scriptures, and orgaized religion just helps to numb people it.

 

well first of all i too believe (believe - not know) in the non-existence of god, but surely this is no evidence for that.
in fact it's an interesting matter but it has nothing to do with religion.
anyway in such small things "god" can always find an easy way out of the mess :p

 

Oh my God youre an anarchist too???? YOU ARE AWESOME!!!! :D

 

Applause to AG for posting this. I've read arguments about morality since the day of Socrates, yet the theists persist in ignoring anything that they don't want to understand.

Demo

 

Robert -- I tried to join, but the Turing word thing at the bottom kept giving me "The word you typed does not match the image", even though I made sure it did. This may need tweaking.

 

If morality is hardwired into our genes, curious that it does not prevent genocides, wars, bullying, rapes, lynchings, child murder, etc., from happening.

 

It do not agree